References & Notes for:
Your Exposome is Your Future
Please note the following: In the context of the interplay of genes and environments–unless the article states otherwise–cultural, historical, political, economic, natural and biophysical factors are viewed as dynamic and interwoven environmental conditions and not as isolated variables.
In addition, the use of the word ‘interplay’ in the context of ‘gene-environment interplay’ and other similar sentences is defined according the following article: Allegrini, A. G., Karhunen, V., Coleman, J. R., Selzam, S., Rimfeld, K., von Stumm, S., … & Plomin, R. (2020). Multivariable GE interplay in the prediction of educational achievement. PLoS Genetics, 16(11), e1009153.
“Quantitative genetic theory distinguishes two types of interplay between genetic and environmental effects, genotype-environment correlation (rGE) and genotype-environment interaction (GxE).”
*****************
1. Wild, C. P. (2005). Complementing the genome with an “exposome”: The outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 14(8), 1847–1850. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0456
Vineis, P., & Barouki, R. (2022). The exposome as the science of social-to-biological transitions. Environment International, 165, 107312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107312
van de Weijer, M. P., Baselmans, B. M. L., Hottenga, J.-J., de Vries, L. P., & Bartels, M. (2024). Capturing the well-being exposome in poly-environmental scores. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 93, 102208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102208
2. Elam, K. K., Lemery-Chalfant, K., & Chassin, L. (2023). A gene-environment cascade theoretical framework of developmental psychopathology. Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science, 132(3), 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000546
Turner, J. D., D’Ambrosio, C., Vögele, C., & Diewald, M. (2020). Twin Research in the Post-Genomic Era: Dissecting the Pathophysiological Effects of Adversity and the Social Environment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21, 3142. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093142
3. William Blake, “Auguries of Innocence” from Poems, ed. Dante Gabriel Rossetti (1863).
4. United Nations General Assembly. (1948, December 10). Universal declaration of human rights (Resolution 217 A [III]). United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
Quote is in the Preamble: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a foundational international legal document adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948.
5. Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What we owe to each other. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
6. Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., & Feldman, M. W. (2000). Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(1), 131–146.
Saltz, J. B., & Nuzhdin, S. V. (2014). Genetic variation in niche construction: Implications for development and evolutionary genetics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29(1), 8–14.
Laland, K. N., Uller, T., Feldman, M. W., Sterelny, K., Müller, G. B., Moczek, A., Jablonka, E., & Odling-Smee, J. (2015). The extended evolutionary synthesis: Its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1813), 20151019.
Odling-Smee, J., Erwin, D. H., Palkovacs, E. P., Feldman, M. W., & Laland, K. N. (2013). Niche construction theory: A practical guide for ecologists. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 88(1), 3–28.
7. Briley, D. A., Livengood, J., & Derringer, J. (2018). Behaviour genetic frameworks of causal reasoning for personality psychology. European Journal of Personality, 32(3), 202-220.
“…individuals actively create or select environmental experiences aligned with their genetically influenced preferences and desires.”
Beam, C. R., Turkheimer, E., Dickens, W. T., & Davis, D. W. (2015). Twin differentiation of cognitive ability through phenotype to environment transmission: The Louisville Twin Study. Behavior Genetics, 45, 622-634.
“People do not randomly select environments, but maneuver and position themselves into environments and milieus where they can thrive, as well as react to environments provided to them (e.g., by caregivers). That is, people select into certain environments (e.g., niches) to reinforce innate or learned abilities…”
Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype → environment effects. Child Development, 54(2), 424-435.
Avinun, R. (2020). The E is in the G: Gene-Environment-Trait Correlations and Findings from Genome-Wide Association Studies. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(1), 81-89.
8. Alexander, R. D. (1974). The evolution of social behavior. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5(1), 325–383.
“When man developed his weapons, culture, and population sizes to levels that essentially erased the significance of predators of other species, he simultaneously created a new predator: groups and coalitions within his own species.”
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (2010). Groups in mind: The coalitional roots of war and morality. Human morality and sociality: Evolutionary and comparative perspectives (pp. 191-234). Palgrave Macmillan.
Kurzban, R., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2001). Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(26), 15387-15392.
Pietraszewski, D. (2016). How the mind sees coalitional and group conflict: The evolutionary invariances of n-person conflict dynamics. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(6), 470-480.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
9. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
Alexander, R. D. (1974). The evolution of social behavior. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5(1), 325–383.
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (2010). Groups in mind: The coalitional roots of war and morality. Human morality and sociality: Evolutionary and comparative perspectives (pp. 191-234).
10. Gilens, M., & Page, B. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(3), 564–581. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714001595
Bartels, L. M. (2016). Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new gilded age (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
11. Kong, A., Thorleifsson, G., Frigge, M. L., Vilhjalmsson, B. J., Young, A. I., Thorgeirsson, T. E., Benonisdottir, S., Oddsson, A., Halldorsson, B. V., Masson, G., Gudbjartsson, D. F., Helgason, A., Bjornsdottir, G., Thorsteinsdottir, U., & Stefansson, K. (2018). The nature of nurture: Effects of parental genotypes. Science, 359(6374), 424–428. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan6877[cite: 57]
Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009). Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 885–908. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017376
12. Kaul, I., Grunberg, I., & Stern, M. A. (Eds.). (1999). Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st century. Oxford University Press.
13. Dworkin, R. (1981). What is equality? Part 1: Equality of welfare; Part 2: Equality of resources. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10(3–4), 185–246, 283–345.
Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Harvard University Press.
Robeyns, I. (2022). Why limitarianism? Journal of Political Philosophy, 30(2), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12275
14. Heath, A. C., Berg, K., Eaves, L. J., Solaas, M. H., Corey, L. A., Sundet, J., Magnus, P., & Nance, W. E. (1985). Education policy and the heritability of educational attainment. Nature, 314(6013), 734–736. https://doi.org/10.1038/314734a0
Knigge, A., Maas, I., Stienstra, K., de Zeeuw, E. L., & Boomsma, D. I. (2022). Delayed tracking and inequality of opportunity: Gene-environment interactions in educational attainment. npj Science of Learning, 7(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00122-1
Scheidel, W. (2017). The great leveler: Violence and the history of inequality from the Stone Age to the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press.
Turchin, P. (2023). End times: Elites, counter-elites, and the path of political disintegration. Penguin Press.